EdTech Archives EdTech Archives The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 15(2)

Cosmic Horror & Digital Learning: What Lovecraft Can Teach Us About Online Education: Presidential Session

Megan Derrick

Introduction

As online learning environments and artificial intelligence (AI) continue to reshape the contours of higher education, students increasingly encounter challenges that are both cognitive and affective in nature. These include feelings of isolation, cognitive overload, and a pervasive uncertainty about expectations and outcomes (Li, 2022; James et al., 2021). Such emotional experiences are not unlike those evoked by the literary genre of cosmic horror, which centers on themes of the unknowable, the incomprehensible, and the indifferent universe (Ralickas, 2008). This paper posits that cosmic horror offers a productive metaphorical framework for understanding the psychological barriers faced by students in digital learning environments.

Cosmic horror, as exemplified in the work of American writer H. P. Lovecraft, diverges from conventional horror narratives by emphasizing existential dread rather than immediate physical threats. It presents terror as a response not to visible monsters but to the gradual realization of humanity’s powerlessness in the face of incomprehensible forces. Characters in these stories often confront ancient intelligences or systems so vast and alien that the human mind can neither fully grasp nor affect them. Key themes such as madness, alienation, and forbidden knowledge parallel many of the affective conditions that define the online learning experience, particularly when educational systems feel opaque, automated, or disconnected from human presence (Hailey et al., 2001; Coghlan et al., 2021).

While Lovecraft’s influence on speculative fiction is well documented, his work is also marked by deeply problematic ideological perspectives, including racism and xenophobia. These legacies must be acknowledged and critically examined. Nevertheless, the structural and emotional dynamics of his fiction provide a compelling lens for examining the design and experience of online education (Ralickas, 2008).

The Fear of the Unknown: Ambiguity and Digital Disorientation

H. P. Lovecraft’s story The Call of Cthulhu introduces a central figure of cosmic horror, an ancient, incomprehensible entity whose reach extends across dreams, oceans, and time itself (Lovecraft, 2005). The narrative’s horror does not reside in direct confrontation but in the protagonist’s gradual realization of a truth too vast to comprehend. This dynamic provides a powerful metaphor for the student experience in online learning environments, where confusion often arises not from the content itself but from ambiguous and fragmented course structures (Li, 2022; James et al., 2021).

Many digital courses present learners with unclear instructions, inconsistent interfaces, and automated assessments that operate with limited transparency. These conditions may provoke anxiety, cognitive overload, and disengagement (Hailey et al., 2001; Puiu et al., 2023). Effective instructional design strategies include modular design with clearly articulated learning outcomes, visual navigation aids, scaffolded demonstrations of digital tools, and thematic progress indicators that orient students within the course trajectory (Agbong & Agbong-Coates, 2024).

Pedagogical Crypts: Structural Inequity in Digital Learning

Lovecraft’s The Rats in the Walls recounts a descent into hidden catacombs beneath an ancestral estate, where long-buried horrors are uncovered (Lovecraft, 2005). This narrative serves as a metaphor for hidden inequities embedded within digital learning environments. Replicated course shells, inaccessible design features, and rigid assessment models often perpetuate structural inequities for neurodiverse students and those from marginalized backgrounds (Asim & Farooq, 2021; Gleason & Heath, 2021).

Instructional design must involve accessibility audits, inclusive redesign, and intentional reduction of unnecessary technological complexity (Adams & Rose, 2014). By critically examining inherited structures, educators can build more equitable and humane online learning spaces.

Isolation in the Void: Cognitive Overload and the Coldness of AI

In At the Mountains of Madness, Lovecraft depicts an ancient civilization governed by austere logic and alien order (Lovecraft, 2005). The resulting isolation mirrors digital learning environments that prioritize automation and analytics over human presence (James et al., 2021; Coghlan et al., 2021). Students engaging primarily with auto-graded systems and faceless interfaces may feel reduced to data points within an indifferent structure.

Embedding instructor presence through personalized videos, formative feedback, collaborative dialogue, and reflective check-ins can mitigate alienation and restore learner agency (Puiu et al., 2023). Modular pacing and microlearning strategies further support cognitive processing and sustained engagement.

Conclusion

Cosmic horror’s metaphors offer valuable insight into the affective and structural challenges of online education. By addressing ambiguity, inequity, and technological alienation through intentional design practices, educators can transform digital learning environments into spaces defined by clarity, connection, and psychological safety.

References

  1. Adams, C., & Rose, E. (2014). Will I ever connect with the students? Online teaching and the pedagogy of care. Phenomenology & Practice, 8(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr20637
  2. Agbong, J. B., & Agbong-Coates, I. J. (2024). Instructors’ presence and communication strategies on student engagement in asynchronous online classes. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.53378/353071
  3. Asim, I., & Farooq, M. S. (2021). Teaching early years children during COVID-19 through digital technologies. Journal of Early Childhood Care and Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30971/jecce.v5i1.1022
  4. Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2021). Good proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of online exam supervision technologies. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1581–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00476-1
  5. Gleason, B., & Heath, M. K. (2021). Injustice embedded in Google Classroom and Google Meet: A techno-ethical audit of remote educational technologies. Journal on Educational Technology, 29(2), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1209
  6. Hailey, D. E., Grant-Davie, K., & Hult, C. A. (2001). Online education horror stories worthy of Halloween. Computers and Composition, 18(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00070-6
  7. James, T., Toth, G., Tomlins, M., Kumur, B., & Bond, K. (2021). Digital disruption in the COVID-19 era: The impact on learning and students’ ability to cope with study in an unknown world. Student Success, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1784
  8. Li, D. (2022). The shift to online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits, challenges, and required improvements from the students’ perspective. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2106
  9. Lovecraft, H. P. (2005). Tales. Library of America.
  10. Puiu, S., Idowu, S. O., Meghisan-Toma, G.-M., Bădîarcea, R. M., Doran, N. M., & Manta, A. G. (2023). Online education management: A multivariate analysis of students’ perspectives and challenges. Electronics, 12(2), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020454
  11. Ralickas, V. (2008). “Cosmic horror” and the question of the sublime in Lovecraft. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 18(3), 364.